Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. Maternity & Gynaecology Guidelines
  3. Maternity
  4. Back
  5. Common obstetric problems, intrapartum labour ward
  6. Uterine Rupture (565)
Announcements and latest updates

Right Decision Service newsletter: April 2024

Welcome to the Right Decision Service (RDS) newsletter for April 2024. 

Issues with RDS and Umbraco access

Tactuum has been working hard to address the issues experienced during the last week. They have identified a series of three mitigation measures and put the first of these in place on Friday 3rd May.  If this does not resolve the problems, the second mitigation will be actioned, and then the third if necessary.

Please keep a lookout for any slowing down of the system or getting locked out. Please email myself, mbuchner@tactuum.com and onivarova@tactuum.com if you experience any problems, and also please raise an urgent support ticket via the Support Portal.

Thank you for your patience and understanding while we achieve a full resolution.

Promotion and communication resources

A rotating carousel presenting some of the key RDS tools and capabilities, and an editable slideset, are now available in the Resources for RDS providers section of the Learning and Support toolkit.

Redesign and improvements to RDS

The redesign of RDS Search and Browse is still on-track for delivery by mid-June 2024. We then plan to have a 3-week user acceptance testing phase before release to live. All editors and toolkit owners on this mailing list will be invited to participate in the UAT.

The archiving and version control functionality is also progressing well and we will advise on timescales for user acceptance testing shortly.

Tactuum is also progressing with the deep linking to individual toolkits within the mobile RDS app. There are several unknowns around the time and effort required for this work, which will only become clear as the work progresses. So we need to be careful to protect budget for this purpose.

New feature requests

These have all been compiled and effort estimated. Once the redesign work is complete, these will be prioritised in line with the remaining budget. We expect this to take place around late June.

Evaluation

Many thanks to those of you completed the value and impact survey we distributed in February. Here are some key findings from the 65 responses we received.

Figure 1: Impact of RDS on direct delivery of care

Key figures

  • 93% say that RDS has improved evidence-informed practice (high impact 62%; some impact 31%)
  • 91% report that RDS has improved consistency in practice (high impact 65%, some impact 26%)
  • 85% say that RDS has improved patient safety (high impact 59%, some impact 26%)
  • Although shared decision-making tools are only a recent addition to RDS, and only represent a small proportion of the current toolset, 85% of respondents still said that RDS had delivered impact in this area (53% high impact, 32% some impact.) 92% anticipate that RDS will deliver impact on shared decision-making in future and 85% believe it will improve delivery of personalised care in future.

Figure 2 shows RDS impact to date on delivery of health and care services

 

Key figures

These data show how RDS is already contributing to NHS reform priorities and supporting delivery of more sustainable care.

Saving time and money

  • RDS clearly has a strong impact on saving practitioner time, with 90% of respondents reporting that this is the case. 65% say it has a high impact; 25% say it has some impact on time-saving.
  • It supports devolved decision-making across the multi-professional team (85% of respondents)
  • 76% of respondents confirm that it saves money compared, for example, to investing in commercial apps (54% high impact; 22% some impact.)
  • 72% believe it has impacted already on saving money and reducing waste in the way services are delivered – e.g. reducing costs of referral management, prescribing, admissions.

Quality assurance and governance

  • RDS leads are clear that RDS has improved local governance of guidelines, with 87% confirming that this is the case. (62% high impact; 25% some impact.)

Service innovation and workforce development

  • RDS is a major driver for service innovation and improvement (83% of respondents) and has impacted significantly on workforce knowledge and skills (92% of respondents – 66% high impact; 26% some impact).

New toolkits

A few examples of toolkits published to live in the last month:

Toolkits in development

Some of the toolkits the RDS team is currently working on:

  • SARCS (Sexual Assault Response Coordination Service)
  • Staffing method framework – Care Inspectorate.
  • SIGN 171 - Diabetes in pregnancy
  • SIGN 158 – British Guideline on Management of Asthma. Selected sections will be incorporated into the RDS, and complemented by a new chronic asthma pathway being developed by SIGN, British Thoracic Society and NICE.
  • Clinical pathways from NHS Fife and NHS Lanarkshire

Please contact his.decisionsupport@nhs.scot if you would like to learn more about a toolkit. The RDS team will put you in touch with the relevant toolkit lead.

Quality audit of RDS toolkits

Thanks to all of you who have responded to the retrospective quality audit survey and to the follow up questions.  We still have some following up to do, and to work with owners of a further 23 toolkits to complete responses. An interim report is being presented to the HIS Quality and Performance Committee.

Implementation projects

Eight clinical services and two public library services are undertaking tests of change to implement the Being a partner in my care app. This app aims to support patients and the public to become active participants in Realistic Medicine. It has a strong focus on personalised, person-centred care and a library of shared decision aids, as well as simple explanations and videoclips to help the public to understand the aims of Realistic Medicine.  The tests of change will inform guidance and an implementation model around wider adoption and spread of the app.

With kind regards

Right Decision Service team

Healthcare Improvement Scotland

Uterine Rupture (565)

Warning
Please report any inaccuracies or issues with this guideline using our online form

Ruptured uterus most commonly occurs in women attempting VBAC, at a rate of approximately 1 in 200 (0.5%). However, it is a risk in any labouring woman. It is a very rare complication in primigravidas. 

Prompt diagnosis and treatment are crucial if the baby is to be born alive. Delays in diagnosis may lead to severe maternal morbidity and mortality. 

Risk factors include:  

  • Previous caesarean section
    • Note the 2-3 fold increase in rupture rate in induced/augmented labours vs spontaneous.
  • Previous uterine trauma/surgery e.g. myomectomy.
  • Late medical termination of pregnancy or medical management of pregnancy loss – particularly with history of previous section/uterine surgery.
  • Oxytocin use in multiparous patients.
  • Malpresentation/obstructed labour.
  • Mullerian tract anomalies. 

Clinical presentation:

  • Commonest sign is prolonged fetal heart deceleration (in 70%).
  • Other signs are pain and bleeding, both of which are unreliable (in only 7.6% and 3.4%, respectively) and often seen in labouring women without rupture. 
  • Unexplained maternal tachycardia/hypotension/syncope.
  • Cessation of uterine contractions associated with suspicious/pathological CTG is particularly suggestive of uterine rupture.
  • Presenting part may no longer be in pelvis or at a ‘higher station’.
  • Pathological pain will usually come through an adequate epidural.
  • Pain may be located to ‘unusual’ sites e.g. shoulders, vulva/perineum, buttocks.

ACTION PLAN

1. Suspect – beware of pathological CTG in association with a risk factor for uterine rupture (usually previous caesarean section).

2. Call anaesthetist and senior obstetrician.

3. Airway

Assess. 

Maintain patency. 

Breathing

Assess. 

Attach pulse oximeter to patient.

Apply oxygen 15 litre/min via face mask with reservoir bag. 

Circulation

Assess pulse and BP – put on ECG and automatic BP monitor.

Secure IV access using two large bore cannulae.

Fluid resuscitation as required.

Send bloods for FBC, cross-match 4 units and clotting screen.

Treat peri-arrest arrhythmias.

CPR if necessary.

4.If baby alive and criteria for safe instrumental delivery are fulfilled, then this may be carried out.

5. Proceed to urgent laparotomy, which may require general anaesthetic, with senior anaesthetist attending. In general a previous low transverse scar can be re-opened. In certain circumstances a mid-line incision should be considered.

6. The type of operation performed is dictated by the size and site of rupture, the degree of haemorrhage and the patient’s future fertility wishes – see further information below.

7. Give prophylactic antibiotics.

8. Document fully in notes with date and time.

9. Debrief patient and family.

Further information

The type of operation performed is dictated by the size of rupture, the degree of haemorrhage, and the patient’s future fertility wishes.

  • Dehiscence of the lower uterine segment in association with a previous caesarean section is the most common operative finding.
  • The rupture may extend anteriorly towards the back of the bladder, laterally towards the uterine arteries, or into the broad ligament plexus of veins and thereby lead to a massive haemorrhage.
  • Posterior rupture may occur and is usually associated with intrauterine malformations but has occurred in patients who have had a previous caesarean section and an obstructed labour and also after a rotational forceps delivery.
  • If repair is attempted then it is important to first secure haemostasis and check for damage to the bladder or ureter. Look for broad ligament bleeding points and check no haematomas are present / developing. A large (14g F) pelvic drain is recommended.
  • If complex repair, consider asking for Gynaecology consultant on call to attend. The presence of a second consultant would be required in event of hysterectomy being necessary.
  • Urological damage is likely to be complex: request specialist urological surgical opinion.
  • If the apex of a tear is not easy to identify, consider placing at least one proximal suture and applying gentle traction. Often the apex can then be identified.
  • Sustained haemorrhage is an indication for performing a total or subtotal hysterectomy. Subtotal hysterectomy is a simpler procedure than total hysterectomy and reduces the risk of damage to the bladder and ureter. Alternative strategies may be appropriate for continuing haemorrhage despite uterine repair (see massive obstetric haemorrhage protocol).
  • Total hysterectomy may be performed, depending on the experience of the operator and the condition of the patient. The prime consideration is to preserve the patient’s life.
  • The ovaries should be conserved in the absence of truly exceptional circumstances.

Editorial Information

Last reviewed: 24/12/2020

Next review date: 01/12/2023

Author(s): Victoria Flanagan.

Version: 2

Approved By: Obstetrics Clinical Governance Group

Reviewer name(s): Dr Roslyn MacBride (ST4)/Dr Victoria Flanagan (Cons) .

Document Id: 565