Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. Maternity & Gynaecology Guidelines
  3. Maternity
  4. Back
  5. Common obstetric problems, intrapartum labour ward
  6. 3rd and 4th Degree Tears (518)
Announcements and latest updates

Right Decision Service newsletter: April 2024

Welcome to the Right Decision Service (RDS) newsletter for April 2024. 

Issues with RDS and Umbraco access

Tactuum has been working hard to address the issues experienced during the last week. They have identified a series of three mitigation measures and put the first of these in place on Friday 3rd May.  If this does not resolve the problems, the second mitigation will be actioned, and then the third if necessary.

Please keep a lookout for any slowing down of the system or getting locked out. Please email myself, mbuchner@tactuum.com and onivarova@tactuum.com if you experience any problems, and also please raise an urgent support ticket via the Support Portal.

Thank you for your patience and understanding while we achieve a full resolution.

Promotion and communication resources

A rotating carousel presenting some of the key RDS tools and capabilities, and an editable slideset, are now available in the Resources for RDS providers section of the Learning and Support toolkit.

Redesign and improvements to RDS

The redesign of RDS Search and Browse is still on-track for delivery by mid-June 2024. We then plan to have a 3-week user acceptance testing phase before release to live. All editors and toolkit owners on this mailing list will be invited to participate in the UAT.

The archiving and version control functionality is also progressing well and we will advise on timescales for user acceptance testing shortly.

Tactuum is also progressing with the deep linking to individual toolkits within the mobile RDS app. There are several unknowns around the time and effort required for this work, which will only become clear as the work progresses. So we need to be careful to protect budget for this purpose.

New feature requests

These have all been compiled and effort estimated. Once the redesign work is complete, these will be prioritised in line with the remaining budget. We expect this to take place around late June.

Evaluation

Many thanks to those of you completed the value and impact survey we distributed in February. Here are some key findings from the 65 responses we received.

Figure 1: Impact of RDS on direct delivery of care

Key figures

  • 93% say that RDS has improved evidence-informed practice (high impact 62%; some impact 31%)
  • 91% report that RDS has improved consistency in practice (high impact 65%, some impact 26%)
  • 85% say that RDS has improved patient safety (high impact 59%, some impact 26%)
  • Although shared decision-making tools are only a recent addition to RDS, and only represent a small proportion of the current toolset, 85% of respondents still said that RDS had delivered impact in this area (53% high impact, 32% some impact.) 92% anticipate that RDS will deliver impact on shared decision-making in future and 85% believe it will improve delivery of personalised care in future.

Figure 2 shows RDS impact to date on delivery of health and care services

 

Key figures

These data show how RDS is already contributing to NHS reform priorities and supporting delivery of more sustainable care.

Saving time and money

  • RDS clearly has a strong impact on saving practitioner time, with 90% of respondents reporting that this is the case. 65% say it has a high impact; 25% say it has some impact on time-saving.
  • It supports devolved decision-making across the multi-professional team (85% of respondents)
  • 76% of respondents confirm that it saves money compared, for example, to investing in commercial apps (54% high impact; 22% some impact.)
  • 72% believe it has impacted already on saving money and reducing waste in the way services are delivered – e.g. reducing costs of referral management, prescribing, admissions.

Quality assurance and governance

  • RDS leads are clear that RDS has improved local governance of guidelines, with 87% confirming that this is the case. (62% high impact; 25% some impact.)

Service innovation and workforce development

  • RDS is a major driver for service innovation and improvement (83% of respondents) and has impacted significantly on workforce knowledge and skills (92% of respondents – 66% high impact; 26% some impact).

New toolkits

A few examples of toolkits published to live in the last month:

Toolkits in development

Some of the toolkits the RDS team is currently working on:

  • SARCS (Sexual Assault Response Coordination Service)
  • Staffing method framework – Care Inspectorate.
  • SIGN 171 - Diabetes in pregnancy
  • SIGN 158 – British Guideline on Management of Asthma. Selected sections will be incorporated into the RDS, and complemented by a new chronic asthma pathway being developed by SIGN, British Thoracic Society and NICE.
  • Clinical pathways from NHS Fife and NHS Lanarkshire

Please contact his.decisionsupport@nhs.scot if you would like to learn more about a toolkit. The RDS team will put you in touch with the relevant toolkit lead.

Quality audit of RDS toolkits

Thanks to all of you who have responded to the retrospective quality audit survey and to the follow up questions.  We still have some following up to do, and to work with owners of a further 23 toolkits to complete responses. An interim report is being presented to the HIS Quality and Performance Committee.

Implementation projects

Eight clinical services and two public library services are undertaking tests of change to implement the Being a partner in my care app. This app aims to support patients and the public to become active participants in Realistic Medicine. It has a strong focus on personalised, person-centred care and a library of shared decision aids, as well as simple explanations and videoclips to help the public to understand the aims of Realistic Medicine.  The tests of change will inform guidance and an implementation model around wider adoption and spread of the app.

With kind regards

Right Decision Service team

Healthcare Improvement Scotland

3rd and 4th Degree Tears (518)

Warning
Please report any inaccuracies or issues with this guideline using our online form

It is critical that 3rd and 4th degree tears are identified and effectively managed.

If in any doubt, ask the sister in charge or a senior doctor (registrar or consultant) to systematically examine the tear including a rectal examination.

All skin tears that extend to the anal margin are 3rd degree tears until proven otherwise by at least a middle grade obstetrician.

Classification of Perineal Tears

  • First-degree: Laceration of the vaginal epithelium or perineal skin only.
  • Second-degree: Involvement of the vaginal epithelium, perineal skin, perineal muscles and fascia but not the anal sphincter.
  • Third-degree: Disruption of the vaginal epithelium, perineal skin, perineal body and anal sphincter muscles. This should be further subdivided into:
    • 3a: Partial tear of the external sphincter involving less than 50% thickness.
    • 3b: Complete tear of the external sphincter
    • 3c: Internal sphincter also torn.
  • Fourth-degree: a third degree tear with disruption of the anal epithelium
  • Rectal Buttonhole tear: A buttonhole tear occurs without involvement of the anal sphincter. It is not a fourth-degree tear and should thus be recorded as a Rectal Buttonhole tear. If not recognised and repaired, this type of tear may lead to a rectovaginal fistula

Principles of Repair

Seniority and Experience Matter!  Inform the Senior Obstetrician on call. 

  • Repair should not be attempted by an inexperienced doctor.
  • Any middle grade undertaking repair must have been suitably trained and signed off as competent. 
  • 4th degree and Buttonhole tears require consultant to be in attendance, even if trainee has been signed off for repairs of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIs).
  • Bleeding points should be identified and secured. Figure of eight sutures should be avoided as they can lead to tissue ischemia (Green top Guideline 2015). If there is excessive bleeding, a vaginal pack should be inserted, and the woman taken to theatre as soon as possible and Tranexamic Acid 1g IV (slow bolus) should be administered.
  • If there is a delay taking the woman to theatre, then a Foleys catheter should be inserted.

Location. All repairs must be conducted in the operating theatre: good lighting, appropriate equipment and aseptic conditions

Equipment. Use the specially prepared Advanced Perineal Repair Pack

Assistant Ensure a scrubbed assistant and scrub nurse/midwife are present

Anaesthesia. All repairs must be performed under general or regional anaesthesia. This is a particularly important pre-requisite for an overlap repair as the inherent tone in the sphincter muscle can cause the torn muscle ends to retract within its’ sheath. Muscle relaxation is necessary to retrieve the ends and overlap without tension.

Evaluation. The full extent of the injury should be determined by a careful vaginal and rectal examination in lithotomy. Classifytear as above, if there is any doubt about the degree of the tear, it is advisable to classify to a higher degree rather than a lower degree.

3rd and 4th Degree Tear Guideline Procedure

Littlewoods’s forceps must not be used on any anal sphincter complex as it increases tissue trauma, bleeding and ischaemia (GTG 2015)

The torn anal epithelium must be repaired either with interrupted Vicryl/Polysorb 3-0 sutures with the knots preferably tied in the anal lumen or by a continuous submucosal stitch.

An internal anal sphincter tear must be must be identified and grasped with Allis  tissue forceps and repaired separately by end-to-end approximation  with interrupted 3-0 PDS sutures.

The torn ends of the external anal sphincter must be identified and grasped with Allis tissue forceps. The muscle is then mobilized to allow repair. Repair with 3.0 PDS

  • Partial (All 3a tears and some 3b) tears should be repaired by ‘End-toEnd’ technique
  • Complete EAS tears (3b) can be repaired by either ‘End-to-End’ technique or ‘Overlap’ technique

A buttonhole injury repair should be performed using the following steps:

  • The torn anal epithelium must be repaired either with interrupted Vicryl/Polysorb 3-0 sutures or by a continuous submucosal stitch.
  • Consideration should be given to a second layer defect closure, or interposition of fascial tissue using Vicryl/Polysorb 3-0
  • Vaginal skin closed with interrupted or continuous Vicryl/Polysorb 2-0

A defunctioning stoma to support these repairs is very rarely needed in obstetric patients undergoing primary repair at time of delivery. 

Following repair of anal sphincter, repairing the perineal muscles to reconstruct the perineal body is very important. This provides support to the sphincter repair and pelvic floor, improving outcomes for patients. Remember that the anal sphincter would be more likely to be traumatised during a subsequent vaginal delivery in the  presence of a short deficient perineum.

It is recommended that surgical knots are buried beneath the superficial perineal muscles to minimise the risk of knot and suture migration to the skin.

A rectal examination should be performed after the repair to ensure that sutures have not been inadvertently inserted through the anorectal mucosa. If a suture is identified, it should be removed.

Immediate Aftercare

Urinary Catheter. Severe perineal discomfort particularly following instrumental delivery is a known cause of urinary retention and following regional anaesthesia, it can take up to 12 hours before bladder sensation returns. A Foley’s catheter should be left in for at least 24 hours. (See GGC Postnatal Bladder Care Guideline).

Antibiotic cover

See GGC Antibiotic prophylaxis protocol with dosage dependent on maternal weight.

The HEPMA OASI Care Bundle should be prescribed which includes analgesia and stool softeners. This includes Movicol 1 sachet TID PO for 14 days with reduction of dose in case of diarrhoea, Paracetamol 1g, QDS, regular prescription (reduce to 500mg if maternal weight <50kg) and Diclofenac 50mg TID, regular prescription. 

Consider modification of this HEPMA bundle in case of pre-existing patient risk factors. Consideration should be given to Sevredol for breakthrough pain in these women only when no relief is obtained with simple analgesics. Bulking agents should not be given routinely with laxatives. PR medication is not advised.

Patients are not expected to move their bowels in the hospital before discharge. 

Thromboprophylaxis assessment

As per GGC protocol.

Notes

As the consequences of anal sphincter disruption can result in litigation, careful and detailed documentation is essential. A diagram demonstrating the extent of the injury and technique of repair is useful to have and will serve to substantiate that a careful examination was performed.

Explanation

The woman should receive detailed information regarding the extent of  trauma / repair.

  • She should be advised that if there are concerns about infection or poor bowel control, she should seek midwife or GP and that she may be referred to hospital where appropriate.
  • She should also be made aware that physiotherapy following a sphincter injury is beneficial. All patients should be reviewed on the ward by physiotherapy team prior to discharge.
  • Women should be advised that 60-80% of women are asymptomatic 12 months following delivery and sphincter repair.

All patients must receive an information leaflet (RCOG or GG&C)

Record

Careful documentation in Intrapartum Operative Proforma.

The details should be recorded in such a way to be retrievable for audit purposes and entered into Datix.

Follow-up

Appointment should be made for 3 months post-natal with either:

  • Patient’s consultant (GRI & RAH deliveries)
  • Perineal Clinic (QEUH deliveries). Please copy all discharge letters to Dr Guerrero at QEUH

Patients with ongoing problems following OASIS from other units can be seen at Perineal clinic (new Victoria ACH) following Consultant-Consultant referral to Urogynaecology Consultant  team

Management of delivery after previous 3rd/4th degree tear in subsequent pregnancies

  • Any woman with a history of a third/fourth degree tear should be reviewed by her consultant during the antenatal period.
  • A recurrence risk of 5-7% should be quoted if having another vaginal delivery.
  • Most women, following assessment and discussion with their consultant will be encouraged to have a normal delivery, if asymptomatic and there are no clinical concerns. However, there should be an individualised discussion with each woman.
  • Women who are symptomatic or have abnormal endoanal ultrasound/manometry and those who have had a 4th degree tear, should have a LUSCS discussed with them. Onwards referral to Perineal Clinic may be appropriate if further assessment is required.
  • There is no evidence that prophylactic episiotomy prevents a recurrence of sphincter rupture and therefore an episiotomy should only be performed if clinically indicated.

Third / Fourth Degree Perineal Repair Pack

Instruments

  • Weislander’s Retractor
  • Tooth forceps (fine and strong)
  • Needle holder (small and large)
  • Allis forceps (4)
  • Artery forceps (6)
  • McIndoe scissors
  • Stitch cutting scissors
  • Sims speculum
  • Deep vaginal side wall retractors
  • Sponge holding forceps (4)
  • Tampon
  • Large swabs
  • Diathermy

Sutures

  • Anal epithelium
    Ethicon Vicryl 3-0, 26mm round bodied needle W9120 
  • Internal anal sphincter
    Ethicon PDS 3-0, 26mm round bodied needle W9124T 
  • External anal sphincter 
    Ethicon PDS 3-0, 26mm round bodied needle W9124T 
  • Perineal muscles
    Ethicon Vicryl rapide 2-0, 35mm tapercut needle W9124 
  • Perineal skin 
    Ethicon Vicryl rapide 2-0, 35mm tapercut needle W9124
    (can be used for subcuticular or interrupted sutures)

Editorial Information

Last reviewed: 30/06/2022

Next review date: 30/06/2024

Author(s): Dr Priyanka Krishnaswamy.

Version: 3

Approved By: Obstetrics Clinical Governance Group

Document Id: 518