Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. Maternity & Gynaecology Guidelines
  3. Gynecology
  4. Back
  5. Gynaecology guidelines
  6. Progesterone use in early pregnancy (1097)
Announcements and latest updates

Right Decision Service newsletter: April 2024

Welcome to the Right Decision Service (RDS) newsletter for April 2024. 

Issues with RDS and Umbraco access

Tactuum has been working hard to address the issues experienced during the last week. They have identified a series of three mitigation measures and put the first of these in place on Friday 3rd May.  If this does not resolve the problems, the second mitigation will be actioned, and then the third if necessary.

Please keep a lookout for any slowing down of the system or getting locked out. Please email myself, mbuchner@tactuum.com and onivarova@tactuum.com if you experience any problems, and also please raise an urgent support ticket via the Support Portal.

Thank you for your patience and understanding while we achieve a full resolution.

Promotion and communication resources

A rotating carousel presenting some of the key RDS tools and capabilities, and an editable slideset, are now available in the Resources for RDS providers section of the Learning and Support toolkit.

Redesign and improvements to RDS

The redesign of RDS Search and Browse is still on-track for delivery by mid-June 2024. We then plan to have a 3-week user acceptance testing phase before release to live. All editors and toolkit owners on this mailing list will be invited to participate in the UAT.

The archiving and version control functionality is also progressing well and we will advise on timescales for user acceptance testing shortly.

Tactuum is also progressing with the deep linking to individual toolkits within the mobile RDS app. There are several unknowns around the time and effort required for this work, which will only become clear as the work progresses. So we need to be careful to protect budget for this purpose.

New feature requests

These have all been compiled and effort estimated. Once the redesign work is complete, these will be prioritised in line with the remaining budget. We expect this to take place around late June.

Evaluation

Many thanks to those of you completed the value and impact survey we distributed in February. Here are some key findings from the 65 responses we received.

Figure 1: Impact of RDS on direct delivery of care

Key figures

  • 93% say that RDS has improved evidence-informed practice (high impact 62%; some impact 31%)
  • 91% report that RDS has improved consistency in practice (high impact 65%, some impact 26%)
  • 85% say that RDS has improved patient safety (high impact 59%, some impact 26%)
  • Although shared decision-making tools are only a recent addition to RDS, and only represent a small proportion of the current toolset, 85% of respondents still said that RDS had delivered impact in this area (53% high impact, 32% some impact.) 92% anticipate that RDS will deliver impact on shared decision-making in future and 85% believe it will improve delivery of personalised care in future.

Figure 2 shows RDS impact to date on delivery of health and care services

 

Key figures

These data show how RDS is already contributing to NHS reform priorities and supporting delivery of more sustainable care.

Saving time and money

  • RDS clearly has a strong impact on saving practitioner time, with 90% of respondents reporting that this is the case. 65% say it has a high impact; 25% say it has some impact on time-saving.
  • It supports devolved decision-making across the multi-professional team (85% of respondents)
  • 76% of respondents confirm that it saves money compared, for example, to investing in commercial apps (54% high impact; 22% some impact.)
  • 72% believe it has impacted already on saving money and reducing waste in the way services are delivered – e.g. reducing costs of referral management, prescribing, admissions.

Quality assurance and governance

  • RDS leads are clear that RDS has improved local governance of guidelines, with 87% confirming that this is the case. (62% high impact; 25% some impact.)

Service innovation and workforce development

  • RDS is a major driver for service innovation and improvement (83% of respondents) and has impacted significantly on workforce knowledge and skills (92% of respondents – 66% high impact; 26% some impact).

New toolkits

A few examples of toolkits published to live in the last month:

Toolkits in development

Some of the toolkits the RDS team is currently working on:

  • SARCS (Sexual Assault Response Coordination Service)
  • Staffing method framework – Care Inspectorate.
  • SIGN 171 - Diabetes in pregnancy
  • SIGN 158 – British Guideline on Management of Asthma. Selected sections will be incorporated into the RDS, and complemented by a new chronic asthma pathway being developed by SIGN, British Thoracic Society and NICE.
  • Clinical pathways from NHS Fife and NHS Lanarkshire

Please contact his.decisionsupport@nhs.scot if you would like to learn more about a toolkit. The RDS team will put you in touch with the relevant toolkit lead.

Quality audit of RDS toolkits

Thanks to all of you who have responded to the retrospective quality audit survey and to the follow up questions.  We still have some following up to do, and to work with owners of a further 23 toolkits to complete responses. An interim report is being presented to the HIS Quality and Performance Committee.

Implementation projects

Eight clinical services and two public library services are undertaking tests of change to implement the Being a partner in my care app. This app aims to support patients and the public to become active participants in Realistic Medicine. It has a strong focus on personalised, person-centred care and a library of shared decision aids, as well as simple explanations and videoclips to help the public to understand the aims of Realistic Medicine.  The tests of change will inform guidance and an implementation model around wider adoption and spread of the app.

With kind regards

Right Decision Service team

Healthcare Improvement Scotland

Progesterone use in early pregnancy (1097)

Warning

Objectives

To provide guidance for the provision of progesterone therapy to women in early pregnancy

Audience

Healthcare Workers in primary and secondary care involved in the care of women in early pregnancy within GG&C

Please report any inaccuracies or issues with this guideline using our online form

This guideline is based on the recently updated NICE guidance (1), whose recommendations are taken from a review of 7 randomised controlled trials including the PRISM and Promise trials. It relates to the use of progesterone in women at risk of miscarriage.

Summary:

  • No benefit of progesterone treatment was found for women with a threatened miscarriage who have no history of miscarriage.
  • Benefit of using vaginal progesterone was found in women who had a threatened miscarriage and a history of one or more miscarriages.
  • No benefit of progesterone treatment was found in women who had a history of recurrent miscarriage.
  • No harm or adverse effects were found in women treated with progesterone

Indications for treatment

  • Women with bleeding in early pregnancy and a past history of miscarriage should be offered progesterone therapy from confirmation scan until 12 weeks gestation (or until 16 weeks gestation after counselling – see patient information leaflet in Appendix 1)
  • An intrauterine pregnancy should be confirmed by scan before commencement of progesterone and this should confirm presence of an intrauterine sac +/- yolk sac
  • In women who have had progesterone given in previously successful pregnancies and request this treatment again, advice should be given that there is no proven benefit (unless there is current bleeding) but also no proven harm. Prescription can be made on an individual basis.
  • In women with a history of recurrent miscarriage (3 or more) who request treatment, advice should be given that there is no proven benefit (unless there is current bleeding) but also no proven harm. Prescription can be made on an individual basis.

Prescribing details

  • The progesterone used should be a vaginal micronized preparation as below.
    • 1st line : Cyclogest 400mg, administered vaginally twice a day.
    • 2nd line Utrogestan 400mg, administered vaginally twice a day.
  • Treatment should be commenced before 9 weeks as no proven benefit beyond this gestation. Can be discussed on an individualised basis if patient requests (see Patient information leaflet, Appendix 1)
  • An initial prescription should be given at the Early Pregnancy Assessment Service (EPAS) after scan as above. The initial prescription will be for 2 weeks, which should then be continued by their GP until 12 weeks gestation (unless previous agreement to continue until 16 weeks)
  • 2 copies of the Patient information leaflet and consent form should be signed, with 1 copy filed in patient notes and 1 copy given to the patient (Appendix 1)

Contraindications to Progesterone treatment

  • Hypersensitivity to progesterone, Sunflower oil, Soybean lecithin, Gelatin, Glycerol, Titanium dioxide (those allergic to peanuts may also be allergic to soya). Severe hepatic dysfunction, Undiagnosed vaginal bleeding, Mammary or genital tract carcinoma, Thrombophlebitis, Thromboembolic disorders, Cerebral haemorrhage, Porphyria.

In the event of a miscarriage

  • If a miscarriage occurs in women taking progesterone therapy, this should be stopped for 4 days prior to active medical management.

Appendix 1: Consent for use of Micronised Vaginal Progesterone treatment in women with early pregnancy bleeding and previous miscarriage

Editorial Information

Last reviewed: 16/08/2023

Next review date: 31/07/2028

Author(s): Dr Lynne Thomson.

Version: 1

Co-Author(s): Dr Anusha D’Sa.

Approved By: Gynaecology Clinical Governance Group

Document Id: 1097