Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. GGC - Clinical Guideline Platform
  3. Maternity
  4. Back
  5. Infections (Maternity)
  6. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) in Pregnancy (674)
Announcements and latest updates

Right Decision Service newsletter: April 2024

Welcome to the Right Decision Service (RDS) newsletter for April 2024. 

Issues with RDS and Umbraco access

Tactuum has been working hard to address the issues experienced during the last week. They have identified a series of three mitigation measures and put the first of these in place on Friday 3rd May.  If this does not resolve the problems, the second mitigation will be actioned, and then the third if necessary.

Please keep a lookout for any slowing down of the system or getting locked out. Please email myself, mbuchner@tactuum.com and onivarova@tactuum.com if you experience any problems, and also please raise an urgent support ticket via the Support Portal.

Thank you for your patience and understanding while we achieve a full resolution.

Promotion and communication resources

A rotating carousel presenting some of the key RDS tools and capabilities, and an editable slideset, are now available in the Resources for RDS providers section of the Learning and Support toolkit.

Redesign and improvements to RDS

The redesign of RDS Search and Browse is still on-track for delivery by mid-June 2024. We then plan to have a 3-week user acceptance testing phase before release to live. All editors and toolkit owners on this mailing list will be invited to participate in the UAT.

The archiving and version control functionality is also progressing well and we will advise on timescales for user acceptance testing shortly.

Tactuum is also progressing with the deep linking to individual toolkits within the mobile RDS app. There are several unknowns around the time and effort required for this work, which will only become clear as the work progresses. So we need to be careful to protect budget for this purpose.

New feature requests

These have all been compiled and effort estimated. Once the redesign work is complete, these will be prioritised in line with the remaining budget. We expect this to take place around late June.

Evaluation

Many thanks to those of you completed the value and impact survey we distributed in February. Here are some key findings from the 65 responses we received.

Figure 1: Impact of RDS on direct delivery of care

Key figures

  • 93% say that RDS has improved evidence-informed practice (high impact 62%; some impact 31%)
  • 91% report that RDS has improved consistency in practice (high impact 65%, some impact 26%)
  • 85% say that RDS has improved patient safety (high impact 59%, some impact 26%)
  • Although shared decision-making tools are only a recent addition to RDS, and only represent a small proportion of the current toolset, 85% of respondents still said that RDS had delivered impact in this area (53% high impact, 32% some impact.) 92% anticipate that RDS will deliver impact on shared decision-making in future and 85% believe it will improve delivery of personalised care in future.

Figure 2 shows RDS impact to date on delivery of health and care services

 

Key figures

These data show how RDS is already contributing to NHS reform priorities and supporting delivery of more sustainable care.

Saving time and money

  • RDS clearly has a strong impact on saving practitioner time, with 90% of respondents reporting that this is the case. 65% say it has a high impact; 25% say it has some impact on time-saving.
  • It supports devolved decision-making across the multi-professional team (85% of respondents)
  • 76% of respondents confirm that it saves money compared, for example, to investing in commercial apps (54% high impact; 22% some impact.)
  • 72% believe it has impacted already on saving money and reducing waste in the way services are delivered – e.g. reducing costs of referral management, prescribing, admissions.

Quality assurance and governance

  • RDS leads are clear that RDS has improved local governance of guidelines, with 87% confirming that this is the case. (62% high impact; 25% some impact.)

Service innovation and workforce development

  • RDS is a major driver for service innovation and improvement (83% of respondents) and has impacted significantly on workforce knowledge and skills (92% of respondents – 66% high impact; 26% some impact).

New toolkits

A few examples of toolkits published to live in the last month:

Toolkits in development

Some of the toolkits the RDS team is currently working on:

  • SARCS (Sexual Assault Response Coordination Service)
  • Staffing method framework – Care Inspectorate.
  • SIGN 171 - Diabetes in pregnancy
  • SIGN 158 – British Guideline on Management of Asthma. Selected sections will be incorporated into the RDS, and complemented by a new chronic asthma pathway being developed by SIGN, British Thoracic Society and NICE.
  • Clinical pathways from NHS Fife and NHS Lanarkshire

Please contact his.decisionsupport@nhs.scot if you would like to learn more about a toolkit. The RDS team will put you in touch with the relevant toolkit lead.

Quality audit of RDS toolkits

Thanks to all of you who have responded to the retrospective quality audit survey and to the follow up questions.  We still have some following up to do, and to work with owners of a further 23 toolkits to complete responses. An interim report is being presented to the HIS Quality and Performance Committee.

Implementation projects

Eight clinical services and two public library services are undertaking tests of change to implement the Being a partner in my care app. This app aims to support patients and the public to become active participants in Realistic Medicine. It has a strong focus on personalised, person-centred care and a library of shared decision aids, as well as simple explanations and videoclips to help the public to understand the aims of Realistic Medicine.  The tests of change will inform guidance and an implementation model around wider adoption and spread of the app.

With kind regards

Right Decision Service team

Healthcare Improvement Scotland

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) in Pregnancy (674)

Warning

Objectives

This guideline covers the diagnosis of CMV in pregnancy and does not cover the management of congenital CMV in the neonate. Management of the neonate can be found in the GGC guideline Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Congenital Infection in Neonates, WoS MCN guidelines.

Please report any inaccuracies or issues with this guideline using our online form

Introduction

CMV is a member of the human herpesvirus family and is the most common viral cause of congenital infection, affecting 0.2-2.2% of all live births. It is responsible for significant morbidity, especially for infants who are symptomatic in the neonatal period. It is the leading cause of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and a major cause of neurological disability. Around 10-15% of neonates with congenital infection will be symptomatic at birth, with a similar percentage developing problems later in childhood.

Epidemiology

CMV infection may be acquired for the first time during pregnancy (primary infection) or women may experience secondary CMV infection, either by reactivation of prior CMV infection or by a new infection with a different strain of the virus. Transmission is more likely following maternal primary infection than following reactivation or recurrent infection with a different strain.

  Primary Infection Secondary infection (reactivation/new strain)
Risk of congenital infection 30-40% 1-2%

Table 1: CMV and risk of congenital infection

The risk of congenital infection varies according to gestation at which infection occurs; 30% in the first trimester increasing to 47% in the second trimester. Although transmission is lower earlier in pregnancy, the proportion of cases with a prenatal diagnosis of severe fetal infection is higher when transmission occurs in the first compared with the third trimester. Although CMV transmission is more likely with primary infection, at the population level, especially in populations with high CMV seroprevalence, the majority (around two thirds) of infants with congenital CMV infection are born to women with pre-existing CMV immunity. (Seroprevalence in UK women is 58%)

Transmission of the virus to the fetus can occur antenatally by the transplacental route, during labour and delivery through contact with cervicovaginal secretions and blood or postnatally through breast milk.

The majority of women who acquire CMV infection for the first time (primary infection) will remain asymptomatic. However a minority of women will experience symptoms including fever, malaise, myalgia, cervical lymphadenopathy. Rare complications include hepatitis and pneumonia.

Screening in pregnancy

The UK does not offer CMV IgG screening as part of the antenatal screening programme for healthy mothers. There is also no role for CMV screening for pregnant women who work in close contact with young children or who may be in contact with a congenitally infected child. This is because CMV seropositivity does not rule out the risk of congenital CMV infection due to reactivation or reinfection with another strain.

Maternal CMV Testing in pregnancy - Maternal indications

In the following circumstances CMV testing should be considered

  1. Pregnant woman with symptoms of fever, malaise, myalgia and or cervical lymphadenopathy where no other aetiology has been found (i.e. respiratory sample is negative)
  2. Pregnant woman with hepatitis (defined as LFT’s at least two times above the upper limit of pregnancy specific range) and testing for hepatitis A,B,C and E is negative

Please send an EDTA blood sample for CMV IgM testing. Epstein Barr virus (EBV) IgM is automatically tested along with CMV IgM and there are no implications to the fetus due to maternal EBV infection. Do NOT send a sample for testing if pruritis is the ONLY symptom.

Maternal CMV Testing in pregnancy - Fetal Indications

1. Antenatal Ultrasound Findings

Maternal CMV testing should be considered if fetal ultrasound identifies any of the following:

Ventriculomegaly Cerebellar hypoplasia
Microcephaly Cortical abnormalities
Calcifications Echogenic bowel
Intraventricular synechiae Pericardial effusion
Intracranial haemorrhage Ascites
Periventricular cysts Fetal hydrops
Fetal growth restriction Estimated fetal weight <3rd centile

Please send an EDTA blood sample for CMV IgG testing. If this is positive the laboratory will then reflex test the antenatal booking blood for CMV IgG and CMV IgM to look for evidence of past infection or seroconversion. Seroconversion would indicate a primary infection has occurred between the time of the booking blood and the current blood. It will take 6 weeks after maternal infection for the fetus to excrete CMV in urine and this can be reliably detected in amniotic fluid from 20 to 21 weeks gestation.

2. Unexplained Intrauterine death

Placenta should be sent to the West of Scotland Virology centre for CMV PCR. If CMV is detected by PCR then contact the virus laboratory to discuss serological testing on stored maternal blood samples. Regardless of gestation age a placental sample should be sent for testing.

Maternal Laboratory diagnosis and interpretation of results

The laboratory can perform both CMV serology and CMV PCR (viral detection) depending on the clinical symptoms, initial laboratory results and the type of sample sent.

  Samples required for testing

Symptomatic women:
Flu-like illness

 

Hepatitis
(please state LFTs levels on the request card to ensure sample is tested)

Respiratory sample (gargle, nasopharyngeal swab) for respiratory virus screen
EDTA blood for CMV IgM (if respiratory sample is negative)

EDTA blood for hepatitis A, B, C, E
(if negative contact laboratory to request CMV IgM add-on testing)

Fetal abnormalities Maternal EDTA blood for CMV IgM and IgG testing
Unexplained intrauterine death Placental sample for CMV PCR

Table 2: Samples required for CMV testing

Maternal CMV IgM and CMV IgG

CMV serology testing comprises of IgM, IgG and IgG avidity testing. A CMV IgM positive result alone does NOT indicate primary CMV infection. CMV IgM can be positive due to primary infection, previous infection with persisting IgM levels or cross-reactivity in the laboratory assay. In pregnancy, nonspecific polyclonal stimulation can lead to false positive results in IgM tests. If the patient is IgM positive the laboratory carries out further investigations including CMV IgG testing and CMV avidity. Depending on the gestational age of testing, the laboratory will re-test the antenatal booking blood for CMV IgG and CMV IgM to help clarify the current patient result.

Maternal CMV avidity

CMV avidity measures the maturity of the antibody and can determine if the patient has had a recent CMV infection. A low avidity is suggestive of a recent infection within the past four months.

A condition of the avidity assay used is that it can only be tested on patients where the IgM and IgG are both positive.

Maternal CMV DNA detection by PCR

Maternal Blood: CMV DNA can be detected in maternal blood two to six weeks post infection and will only be tested by the laboratory in cases where the CMV IgM is positive and the CMV IgG is negative. Clinicians should NOT request CMV PCR on maternal blood samples; this will be done internally by the laboratory.

Fetal Laboratory diagnosis and interpretation of results

On confirmation of maternal infection, the presence of fetal infection and possible severity can be determined by the following investigations:

Amniocentesis for detection of fetal urinary excretion of CMV: It will take 6 weeks after maternal infection for the fetus if infected to excrete CMV in urine and this can be reliably detected in amniotic fluid from 20 to 21 weeks gestation (the sensitivity of CMV PCR detection before 20 weeks gestation is only 45% (Rawlinson et al 2017)) . If fetal ultrasound has demonstrated anomalies which may also have an association with fetal karyotype anomalies discuss fetal karyotyping at the time of amniocentesis and ensure an adequate sample (40 mls) is obtained for both investigations if indicated.

Antenatal management of confirmed fetal infection

  • When fetal CMV infections has been confirmed by amniocentesis, serial ultrasound examination of the fetus (including growth and intracranial anatomy) should be performed every 2-3 weeks until delivery.
  • In infected fetuses consider fetal cerebral MRI (T1 and T2 and diffusion sequences) at 28-32 weeks gestation as complementary investigation to ultrasound assessment for fetal brain sequelae.
  • In infected fetuses with non-cerebral ultrasound abnormalities consider fetal blood sampling (for platelet count) to aid estimation of prognosis as described below. Fetal blood sampling is associated with a 1% risk of fetal loss but this risk will be significantly greater in thrombocytopenic fetuses.
  • In infected fetuses with no ultrasound abnormalities the risk and possible prognostic benefit of fetal blood sampling should be discussed taking into account the estimated timing of fetal infection.

Infected fetuses may be classified into one of three prognostic categories:

  1. Asymptomatic fetuses: defined as those with no ultrasound abnormalities, normal cerebral MRI findings and normal platelet count. The prognosis is generally good for these fetuses but with a residual risk of hearing loss. For counselling of the parents with regard to their baby’s post-natal management refer to the GGC guideline Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Congenital Infection in Neonates, WoS MCN guidelines.
  2. Severely symptomatic fetuses: defined as those with severe cerebral ultrasound anomalies (e.g. ultrasound findings of microcephaly, ventriculomegaly, intracerebral haemorrhage, MRI findings of white matter abnormalities, cavitation or delayed cortical maturation). The prognosis is poor and counselling including the option of termination should be offered.
  3. Mild or moderately symptomatic fetuses: defined as those with thrombocytopenia:
    • Without brain abnormalities OR
    • With an isolated ultrasound finding of hyperechogenic bowel, mild ventriculomegally or isolated calcification

The prognosis of these mild or moderately symptomatic fetuses is uncertain and options include termination of pregnancy or conservative management with ongoing follow up with ultrasound (+/- repeat MRI at a 4-week interval if the latter performed at advanced fetal gestational age would influence parental choice of continuing with the pregnancy or not).

Treatment in pregnancy

Both hyperimmuneglobulin (HIG) and valaciclovir have been used in clinical trials but there are currently no recommended antiviral treatment options for primary CMV infection in pregnancy. The current treatments for CMV of ganciclovir and foscarnet cannot be given during pregnancy.

CMV prevention

No CMV vaccination exits. Prevention is based on reducing contact with CMV contaminated fluids (urine or saliva) in the environment. All pregnant women should be informed in methods to reduce CMV exposure. Preventative measures have been described by Rawlinson et al (2017). These include: (1) wash hands for 15 to 20 seconds with soap and water after changing nappies/ feeding young children or wiping a young child’s nose or saliva, (2) avoid contact with saliva when kissing a child, (3) avoid sharing food, drinks or cooking utensils, (4) do not put a young child’s dummy in your mouth and (5) try to wash down areas that a young child’s urine or saliva may have been e.g. toys

There is no evidence of nosocomial infection from seronegative staff working with CMV infected secretions from a baby as long as standard hand hygiene is adhered to within the neonatal unit (Luck S, Sharland M 2009).

Contact details

To discuss sample testing or laboratory results contact the West of Scotland Specialist Virology Centre. Email: west.ssvc2@nhs.scot, the email is monitored by the clinical team between 9am - 5pm Monday-Friday and 9am-2pm at weekends. Phone 0141 201 8722  (ask to speak to a member of the clinical team) Monday-Friday 9am-5pm.

If phoning out of hours or weekends please contact the switchboard and ask to speak to the on-call virologist.

Editorial Information

Last reviewed: 08/05/2024

Next review date: 01/04/2029

Author(s): Dr Dawn Kernaghan.

Co-Author(s): Dr Samantha Shepherd, Principal Clinical Scientist, West of Scotland Specialist Virology Centre , Dr Janice Gibson, Consultant Obstetrician, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow.

Approved By: Maternity Governance Group

Document Id: 674

References

Kagan KO, Hamprecht K. Cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy. Archive of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2017; 296:15-26.

Khalil A, Heath P, Jones C, Soe A, Ville YG on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection: Update on Treatment. Scientific Impact Paper No. 56. BJOG 2018; 125:e1-e11.

Luck S, Sharland M. Postnatal cytomegalovirus: innocent bystander or hidden problem. Archives of Disease in Childhood, fetal and neonatal Edition 2009; 94: F58-F64.

Rawlinson WD, Boppana SB, Fowler KB, Kimberlin DW et al. Congenital cytopmegalovirus infection in pregnancy and the neonate: consensus recommendations for prevention, diagnosis and therapy. Lancet 2017; 17:e177-e188.

Saldan A, Forner G, Mengoli C, Gussetti N et al. Testing for cytomegalovirus in pregnancy. Journal Clinical Microbiology 2017; 55:693-702.