Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. GGC - Clinical Guideline Platform
  3. Maternity
  4. Back
  5. Common obstetric problems, intrapartum labour ward
  6. Indications for Obstetric Consultant Attendance in Labour Ward (595)
Announcements and latest updates

Right Decision Service newsletter: April 2024

Welcome to the Right Decision Service (RDS) newsletter for April 2024. 

Issues with RDS and Umbraco access

Tactuum has been working hard to address the issues experienced during the last week. They have identified a series of three mitigation measures and put the first of these in place on Friday 3rd May.  If this does not resolve the problems, the second mitigation will be actioned, and then the third if necessary.

Please keep a lookout for any slowing down of the system or getting locked out. Please email myself, mbuchner@tactuum.com and onivarova@tactuum.com if you experience any problems, and also please raise an urgent support ticket via the Support Portal.

Thank you for your patience and understanding while we achieve a full resolution.

Promotion and communication resources

A rotating carousel presenting some of the key RDS tools and capabilities, and an editable slideset, are now available in the Resources for RDS providers section of the Learning and Support toolkit.

Redesign and improvements to RDS

The redesign of RDS Search and Browse is still on-track for delivery by mid-June 2024. We then plan to have a 3-week user acceptance testing phase before release to live. All editors and toolkit owners on this mailing list will be invited to participate in the UAT.

The archiving and version control functionality is also progressing well and we will advise on timescales for user acceptance testing shortly.

Tactuum is also progressing with the deep linking to individual toolkits within the mobile RDS app. There are several unknowns around the time and effort required for this work, which will only become clear as the work progresses. So we need to be careful to protect budget for this purpose.

New feature requests

These have all been compiled and effort estimated. Once the redesign work is complete, these will be prioritised in line with the remaining budget. We expect this to take place around late June.

Evaluation

Many thanks to those of you completed the value and impact survey we distributed in February. Here are some key findings from the 65 responses we received.

Figure 1: Impact of RDS on direct delivery of care

Key figures

  • 93% say that RDS has improved evidence-informed practice (high impact 62%; some impact 31%)
  • 91% report that RDS has improved consistency in practice (high impact 65%, some impact 26%)
  • 85% say that RDS has improved patient safety (high impact 59%, some impact 26%)
  • Although shared decision-making tools are only a recent addition to RDS, and only represent a small proportion of the current toolset, 85% of respondents still said that RDS had delivered impact in this area (53% high impact, 32% some impact.) 92% anticipate that RDS will deliver impact on shared decision-making in future and 85% believe it will improve delivery of personalised care in future.

Figure 2 shows RDS impact to date on delivery of health and care services

 

Key figures

These data show how RDS is already contributing to NHS reform priorities and supporting delivery of more sustainable care.

Saving time and money

  • RDS clearly has a strong impact on saving practitioner time, with 90% of respondents reporting that this is the case. 65% say it has a high impact; 25% say it has some impact on time-saving.
  • It supports devolved decision-making across the multi-professional team (85% of respondents)
  • 76% of respondents confirm that it saves money compared, for example, to investing in commercial apps (54% high impact; 22% some impact.)
  • 72% believe it has impacted already on saving money and reducing waste in the way services are delivered – e.g. reducing costs of referral management, prescribing, admissions.

Quality assurance and governance

  • RDS leads are clear that RDS has improved local governance of guidelines, with 87% confirming that this is the case. (62% high impact; 25% some impact.)

Service innovation and workforce development

  • RDS is a major driver for service innovation and improvement (83% of respondents) and has impacted significantly on workforce knowledge and skills (92% of respondents – 66% high impact; 26% some impact).

New toolkits

A few examples of toolkits published to live in the last month:

Toolkits in development

Some of the toolkits the RDS team is currently working on:

  • SARCS (Sexual Assault Response Coordination Service)
  • Staffing method framework – Care Inspectorate.
  • SIGN 171 - Diabetes in pregnancy
  • SIGN 158 – British Guideline on Management of Asthma. Selected sections will be incorporated into the RDS, and complemented by a new chronic asthma pathway being developed by SIGN, British Thoracic Society and NICE.
  • Clinical pathways from NHS Fife and NHS Lanarkshire

Please contact his.decisionsupport@nhs.scot if you would like to learn more about a toolkit. The RDS team will put you in touch with the relevant toolkit lead.

Quality audit of RDS toolkits

Thanks to all of you who have responded to the retrospective quality audit survey and to the follow up questions.  We still have some following up to do, and to work with owners of a further 23 toolkits to complete responses. An interim report is being presented to the HIS Quality and Performance Committee.

Implementation projects

Eight clinical services and two public library services are undertaking tests of change to implement the Being a partner in my care app. This app aims to support patients and the public to become active participants in Realistic Medicine. It has a strong focus on personalised, person-centred care and a library of shared decision aids, as well as simple explanations and videoclips to help the public to understand the aims of Realistic Medicine.  The tests of change will inform guidance and an implementation model around wider adoption and spread of the app.

With kind regards

Right Decision Service team

Healthcare Improvement Scotland

Indications for Obstetric Consultant Attendance in Labour Ward (595)

Warning

Please report any inaccuracies or issues with this guideline using our online form

Patient safety and quality of care is the priority.

The positive effect of direct consultant care is recognised. Consultant work patterns have been altered to facilitate their contribution to acute Obstetric care. There should be no hesitation to call Consultants to the Labour Ward area and Consultants should respond positively to requests for assistance.

A request to attend should be communicated clearly, in a structured way (e.g. by using SBAR). The request should be documented in the notes. If consultant input is required, this should happen before a management plan is discussed with the woman.

Attendance in person

In the following situations, the consultant should attend in person, whatever the level of the trainee:

  • Eclampsia
  • Maternal collapse (such as massive abruption, septic shock)
  • Life threatening maternal condition (such as amniotic fluid embolism)
  • Postpartum haemorrhage of more than 1.5 litres where the haemorrhage is continuing and a MOH protocol has been instigated
  • Return to theatre
  • Caesarean birth for major placenta praevia or placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) 
  • Vaginal twin births
  • Vaginal breech birth
  • Instrumental birth in women with BMI greater than 50
  • Caesarean birth in women with BMI greater than 50
  • Caesarean birth after intrauterine death has occurred
  • Caesarean birth for transverse lie
  • Caesarean birth at less than 30 weeks gestation
  • Uterine rupture
  • Fourth Degree perineal tear
  • Caesarean birth for any women declining blood products
  • Unexpected intrapartum stillbirth
  • When requested for any reason

Attendance in person or immediately available

For the procedures listed below, the consultant should attend in person or should be immediately available (i.e. present on labour ward) unless the trainee on duty is an ST7 and has been assessed by the unit and signed off, by OSATS where these are available, as competent for the procedure in question:

  • Full dilatation caesarean birth
  • Trial of forceps / vacuum
  • Rotational Forceps
  • Caesarean birth at 30-34 weeks gestation
  • Caesarean birth where the woman has had 3 or more previous caesarean sections
  • Third degree perineal tear (trainees at other levels who have been assessed to be competent may perform these unsupervised.)
  • Any woman who requires transfer to ITU

Situations where Consultants should be informed

In the following situations the consultant should be informed and a decision whether direct review or advice is appropriate should be made depending on each case. There should be a low threshold for attendance and direct contribution to care.

  • Severe maternal compromise (MEWS >7)
  • Any woman admitted to an Obstetric HDU or ITU
  • An intrauterine transfer (either out or in; discussion prior to decision)
  • Preterm labour less than 30 weeks
  • Severe pre-eclampsia – requiring IV therapy
  • Severe antepartum haemorrhage (evidence of maternal or fetal compromise)

Other factors

There will be times when consultant input is required due to high levels of clinical activity, rather than a single complex case. Where there are multiple factors present that overall increase the difficulty of a case the consultant should be called.

Senior midwifery staff or other medical staff should contact the consultant directly if it is considered that the clinical situation requires their input.

Consultants should be called for help if any clinical situation where their direct input to care would potentially improve the outcome for the mother and baby.

Editorial Information

Last reviewed: 27/02/2024

Next review date: 26/02/2029

Author(s): Ros Jamieson.

Version: 3

Approved By: Maternity Clinical Governance Group

Document Id: 595